Ά‘Μƒhƒi[‚Ι‚¨‚―‚ιpŒγŽct‹@”\‹K’θˆφŽq‚ΜŒŸ“’
Factors Related to Suboptimal Recovery of Renal Function after Living Donor Nephrectomy

ŒF–{Τ\Žš•a‰@ ŠO‰Θ
* Ό“c@γāA–Ψ‰Ί@q•½A“c’†@N‰ξA“ϊϋό@—IŽkAŽR‰i@¬”ό
ŒF–{Τ\Žš•a‰@ “ΰ‰Θ
μ’[@’m»Aΰ_”Vγ@“NA–L“c –ƒ—ŽqAγ–ΨŒ΄ @ˆκ
ŒF–{Τ\Žš•a‰@ ”ε”AŠν‰Θ
 
Ό“c@γāAˆξ—―@²l
“Œ‹žŽ•‰Θ‘εŠwŽsμ‘‡•a‰@ ”ε”AŠν‰Θ
 
Ό“c@γΔ

y”wŒizΆ‘Μƒhƒi[Žct‚Μ‘½‚­‚͏pŒγ‘γž«‹@”\˜΄i‚Ι‚ζ‚θt‹@”\‚ͺp‘O‚Μ6-7Š„‚Ι‰ό‘P‚·‚ι‚ͺA‰ό‘P‚΅‚Θ‚’Η—α‚ΰ‚ ‚ιB‚»‚Μ‹K’θˆφŽq‚πlŽ@‚΅‚½•ρ‚͏­‚Θ‚’B

y‘ΏہE•ϋ–@z2011”N‚©‚η2016”N‚ά‚Ε‚ΙŽ{s‚΅‚½Ά‘̐tˆΪA111—α‚Μ‚€‚Ώ, lost to follow up‚Ζ‚Θ‚Α‚½5—α‹y‚Ρ1ŽžŠΤŒγΆŒŸ–’3—α‚πœ‚­103—α‚πŒŸ“’‚΅‚½B”ρ‘γžŒQin=40j‚πpŒγ1”NeGFR‚ͺp‘OeGFR‚Μ6Š„ˆΘ‰Ί‚̏Ǘα‚Ζ’θ‹`‚΅A‚»‚κˆΘŠO‚Μ‘γžŒQin=63j‚ΖŒγ•ϋŽ‹“I‚Ι”δŠrŒŸ“’‚΅‚½B

yŒ‹‰Κz—ΌŒQ‚ŏp‘OeGFR‚Ν“―“™‚Ε‚ ‚Α‚½‚ͺi ‘γžŒQ:82.0}13.1mL/min/1.73m2 vs”ρ‘γžŒQ:83.5}14.8mL/min/1.73m2AP=0.588jA”N—ξi56.0}10.4Ξ vs 60.7}8.7ΞCP=0.018jAHbA1ci5.6}0.3% vs 5.8}0.3%CP0.016jA”AŽ_’li4.8}1.2mg/dl vs 5.5}1.3mg/dlCP0.007j‚Ν”ρ‘γžŒQ‚Ε—LˆΣ‚ɍ‚‚©‚Α‚½B‚ά‚½A”ρ‘γžŒQ‚ł͏pŒγ1ŽžŠΤ•a—ΆŒŸ‚Ι‚Δchronicity scoreiah†1‚©‚Βci ct†1j‚π”F‚ί‚½Η—α‚ͺ25.0%‚Ε‚ ‚θA‘γžŒQ‚Μ6.4%‚ζ‚θ—LˆΣ‚ɍ‚‚©‚Α‚½iP0.007jB‘½•Ο—Κ‰πΝ‚Ε‚Ν, chronicity scoreiah†1‚©‚Βci ct†1, odds ratioiORj: 4.75, 95% confidence intervail CIj: 1.27-17.8, p=0.021j‚Ζ”AŽ_iOR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.06-2.15, p=0.022j‚ͺ“Ζ—§ˆφŽq‚Ζ‚Θ‚Α‚½B

yŒ‹ŒκzpŒγ1”N‚Μ‘γž«t‹@”\˜΄i‚Μ—L–³‚͏p‘OeGFR‚ΙŠΦ˜A‚Ή‚Έ, ‘gDŠw“I‚ΙŒŒŠΗΞŠD‰»‚ƐόˆΫ‰»‚Μ‚ ‚ιΗ—α‚Əp‘O‚”AŽ_ŒŒΗ‚π—L‚·‚ιΗ—α‚Ε‚«‚½‚΅‚Ι‚­‚’‰Β”\«‚ͺŽ¦΄‚³‚κ‚½B

–߁@‚ι@@ƒy[ƒW‚̐ζ“ͺ